Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 99370 (MAD)

G.SANDEEP KUMAR v. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER

WP/1106/2025 · 2025-01-22

P T Asha

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P.No.1106 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated : 22.01.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Ms. JUSTICE P.T. ASHA W.P.No. 1106 of 2025 G.Sandeep Kumar ...Petitioner Vs. 1.The Revenue Divisional Officer Chengalpattu, Chengalpattu District. 2.S.Govindaraj 3.P.Sathyavathi 4.P.Suguna 5.Shanthi ...Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1st respondent to the consider petitioner's representation dated 14.10.2024. 1/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.1106 of 2025 For Petitioner : Mr. G.Sandeep Kumar (Party – in – Person). For Respondents : Mr. A.Selvendran Special Government Pleader. O R D E R The Writ Petition is filed for the following relief: “To direct the 1st respondent to the consider petitioner's representation dated 14.10.2024..” 2. The party in person has approached this Court for a mandamus directing the 1st respondent to consider his representation dated 14.10.2024, within stipulated time and pass orders. 3.The petitioner's contention is that the property belonged to his grand father, Sthalasayanam Naidu, who had two sons and two daughters, Govindaraj, Sathyavathi, Sritharan and Suguna. The petitioner and his sister are the children of Govindaraj, through his first wife. 2/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.1106 of 2025 4.The petitioner would submit that there being an ancestral property they are all entitled to the share in the properties of their grand father and they had filed a suit in O.S.No.781 of 2024 on the file of the Additional District Court, Chengalpattu, for partition. The petitioner's apprehension is that the other sharers are attempting to mutate the revenue records without notice to the petitioner. 5. A representation has been made by the petitioner, which has not been considered. Therefore, the petitioner is before this Court. 6. Heard the party in person and the learned Special Government Pleader. 7. Considering the limited request that has been made and taking note of the fact that the suit is pending, a mandamus is issued to the 1st respondent to consider the petitioner's representation after issuing notice to the parties concerned, within a period of 8 weeks from the 3/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.1106 of 2025 date of receipt of a copy of this order. Till such time as the enquiry is completed, revenue records shall not be mutated. 8. The Writ Petition is allowed. No costs. 22.01.2025 Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No kan To 4/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.1106 of 2025 1.The Revenue Divisional Officer Chengalpattu, Chengalpattu District. P.T. ASHA, J, 5/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.1106 of 2025 kan W.P.No. 1106 of 2025 22.01.2025 6/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis