Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
APHC010111342020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 6788/2020 Between:
1. SHAIK SAIDABI,, W/O. SHAIK HUSSEN, AGED ABOUT YEARS, OCC- HOUSE WIFE, RIO. ARUNDELPET, 4/4, OLD DOOR NO.6-4-113, NEW DOOR NO.31-4-355, GUNTUR
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOME, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, GUNTUR URBAN, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, ARUNDELPET POLICE STATION, ARUNDELPET, GUNTUR.
4. KARETI SRINIVASA RAO, S/O. (LATE) PUNNAIAH, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, OCC- LEGAL PROFESSION R/O. D.NO.3-6-5, PINNAPADU, TENALI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
5. PUVVADA SRINIVASA RAO, S/O. NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, OCC- BUSINESS C/O.
D.NO.3-6-5, PINNAPADU, TENALI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. G KONDALA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME (AP) The Court made the following: ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for:
“.... a writ order or direction more particularly one in nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction on the part of the respondent No 2 and 3 in acting on the complaint dated 02032020 and registering the crime against respondent Nos 4 and 5 as arbitrary illegal abdication of the statutory duty cast on him and violate the fundamental rights guaranteed to me under
2
Articles 14 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent No 2 and 3 to act on the compliant dated 02.03.2020 submitted by me and take action on the same”
2. Today, when the matter came up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that nothing survives for adjudication in the Writ Petition and the matter has become infructuous.
3. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. __________________________________ Dr.VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA, J
Date: 12.08.2025 Asr
3
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
W.P.No.6788 of 2020
Dt.12.08.2025
Asr