CWP-26730-2025 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 106 CWP-26730-2025 (O&M) Date of Decision :16.09.2025 Union Territory, Chandigarh and others ..Petitioners Versus Union of India and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS SURI Present: Ms. Sukhmani Patwalia, Senior Panel Counsel with Mr. Viraj Gandhi, Advocate for the petitioners-U.T. Chd. Mr. Arjun Pratap Atma Ram, Advocate with Ms. Ananya Kalia, Advocate for respondent No.4. Mr. Satyapal Jain, Addl. Solicitor General of India (through V.C.) with Mr. Karanvir Singh Kathuria, Advocate for respondents-UOI. * * * Harsimran Singh Sethi, J. (Oral) 1. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that the issue raised before the Central Administrative Tribunal, Chandigarh (for short, ‘the Tribunal’) has already been heard and the judgment has been reserved by the Tribunal. In view of the same, the present writ petition challenging the interim order dated 31.07.2025 (Annexure P1) and order dated 18.08.2025 (Annexure P/2) passed by the Tribunal has been rendered infructuous and the same may be disposed of accordingly. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the present petition may kindly be disposed of having been not pressed any further with AARTI SHARMA 2025.09.19 14:28 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-26730-2025 (O&M) -2- liberty to the petitioners that in case, the final order to be passed by the Tribunal causes any prejudice to the petitioners, the petitioners can avail an appropriate remedy. 3. Ordered accordingly. 4. Pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of. (HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) JUDGE (VIKAS SURI) September 16, 2025 JUDGE aarti Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes Whether reportable : No AARTI SHARMA 2025.09.19 14:28 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document