IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 201 CWP-29288-2022 (O&M) Date of Decision:- 26.08.2025 GURPREET SINGH ....Petitioner(s) Versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT MAGISTRATE , KHANNA, DISTT. LUDHIANA AND ANOTHER ...Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHEEL NAGU, CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV BERRY Present: Mr. Mohit Vashisht, Advocate for the petitioner (through V.C.) Mr. Salil Sabhlok, Sr. DAG Punjab. Ms. Deepika Mittal, Advocate for Mr. Rajiv Joshi, Advocate for respondent No.2. * * * * SHEEL NAGU, C.J. (Oral) 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter stands settled and therefore he wants to withdraw this petition. 2. Accordingly, the petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. 3. However, the petitioner always has a remedy of approaching the DRT in case the grievance is not redressed. (SHEEL NAGU) CHIEF JUSTICE (SANJIV BERRY) JUDGE 26.08.2025 S.Sharma i) Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No ii) Whether reportable? Yes/No SANDAL SHARMA 2025.08.27 16:24 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment