CRP No. 591 of 2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 17-07-2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE N. SATHISH KUMAR CRP No. 591 of 2020 and CMP No.3066 of 2020 K.Murugesan(died) 1. Kumari, W/o. Late K.Murugesan, Residing at Ambedkar Street, Anna Nagar, Kannivakkam 603202. 2. Victor, S/o. Late K.Murugesan, Residing at Ambedkar Street, Anna Nagar, Kannivakkam 603202. 3. Gopalakanaj, S/o. Late K.Murugesan, Residing at Ambedkar Street, Anna Nagar, Kannivakkam 603202. 4.M.Venkatesan, S/o. Late K.Murugesan, Residing at Ambedkar Street Anna Nagar, Kannivakkam 603202. 5. Yesuaddial, D/o. Late K.Murugesan, Residing at Ambedkar Street, Anna Nagar, Kannivakkam 603202. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRP No. 591 of 2020 6. Yesubadam, S/o. Late K.Murugesan, Residing at Ambedkar Street, Anna Nagar, Kannivakkam 603202. .....Petitioner(s) -Versus- 1. Doss, S/o. Ekambaram, Residing at Thulukkanathamman Koil Street, Anna Nagar, Kannivakkam, Guduvancherry 6032020 2. Anandan, S/o. Ekambaram, Residing atThulukkanathamman Koil Street, Anna Nagar, Kannivakkam, Guduvancherry 6032020 3. Chockammal, W/o. Ekambaram, Residing at Thulukkanathamman Koil Street, Anna Nagar, Kannivakkam, Guduvancherry 6032020 .....Respondent(s) Petition filed under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, praying to set aside the Order and decretal order dated 31.07.2019 in EA No.24 of 2019 in EP No.147 of 2016 in OS No.138 of 2013 on the file of the Additional Subordinate Judge, Chengalpattu, and allow this revision. For Petitioner(s) : M/s.S.Udhayakumar R.Subramaniyam (No Appearance) For Respondent(s) : No Appearance for RR1 & 2 : Affidavit of Service for private notice for R3 not filed https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRP No. 591 of 2020 ORDER Though this court, by order dated 19.03.2024, had directed that fresh notice be taken on the 3 rd respondent both through Court and privately, the revision petitioners have not filed an affidavit of proof of service (POS) with respect to the private notice on the 3 rd respondent till date. 2. When the matter was called for hearing, there was no representation on behalf of the revision petitioners. There was also no representation for respondents 1 and 2, despite service of notice on them. 3. In the light of the above, the revision petition is dismissed for default on the part of the revision petitioners. No costs. Consequently, the connected CMP is closed. 17-07-2025 Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation:Yes/No kmk To 1.The Additional Subordinate Judge, Chengalpattu, Chengalpattu District. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRP No. 591 of 2020 N.SATHISH KUMAR J. kmk CRP No. 591 of 2020 17-07-2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis