Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 99334 (ALL)

SUNIL KUMAR SINGH v. THE STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIB/3856/2025 · 2025-09-21

Chandra Kumar Rai

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - B No. - 3856 of 2025 Court No. - 37 HON'BLE CHANDRA KUMAR RAI, J. 1.Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. 2.The instant petition has been filed for the following relief:- "i.Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the Board of Revenue, U.P. Lucknow to process and decide Revision No.696 of 2020, Janardan and others vs. Sub Divisional Officer, Tehsil: Sadar, District: Gorakhpur and another pending since 17.03.2020 be decided as early as possible within short span of time." 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the aforementioned revision filed by the respondent Nos.3 and 4 is pending before respondent No.2-Board of Revenue U.P. Lucknow since 2020. He further placed certified copy of the order sheet, which has been annexed as Annexure No.5 to the writ petition in order to demonstrate that the case is not proceeding expeditiously. 4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the issue, the present petition stands disposed of finally directing respondent No.2- Board of Revenue, U.P. Lucknow to decide the aforementioned Revision No.696 of 2020 in accordance with law expeditiously and preferably within a period of two months from the date of production of certified copy of this order after giving opportunity of hearing to both the parties. (Chandra Kumar Rai,J.) September 22, 2025 PS*/Vandana Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Adya Prasad Tewari Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Sunil Kumar Singh .....Petitioner(s) The State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- VANDANA YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad