Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 99315 (ALL)

C/M ST. THOMAS INTER COLLEGE v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

WRIA/14311/2025 · 2025-09-21

Mayur Jain Jt Registrar J Listing

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 14311 of 2025 Court No. - 32 HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J. 1. The instant writ petition has been filed seeking the following main prayers:- "(i) Issue writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent no. 2 to acknowledge the order and representation dated 05.09.2025 passed by the petitioner in light of the order dated 19.05.2025 passed in Special Appeal No. 202 of 2025. (ii) Issue writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus restraining the respondents from compelling the petitioner to grant compassionate appointment to the respondent no. 3 and close her issue of compassionate appointment in light of the action taken by the petitioner in accordance with law alternatively direct the respondent no. 2 to decide the representation of the petitioner dated 05.09.2025. (iii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents not to interfere in the working of the petitioner's minority institution." 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the State respondents and Sri Prabhakar Awasthi along with Sri Dinesh Mishra, learned counsel for respondent no. 3. 3. Sri Awasthi, learned counsel for respondent no. 3 vehemently opposed the writ petition and submitted, on instructions, that the respondent no. 3 is not interested to apply in the petitioner's institution for the post of Class Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Gaurav Tripathi Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. C/M St. Thomas Inter College .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) III and IV on compassionate ground. 4. At this juncture, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the instant petition may be disposed of in the light of the submissions made by Sri Awasthi, learned counsel for the respondent no. 3. 5. Taking into consideration of submissions of Sri Awasthi, learned counsel for respondent no. 3 as well as learned counsel for the petitioner, I do not find any reason to keep the writ petition pending. 6. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. September 22, 2025 Pratima WRIA No. 14311 of 2025 2 (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- PRATIMA AGRAHARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad