Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9931 (JHR)

RANJAN GOPE v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./3299/2025 · 2025-04-24

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2025:JHHC:12239 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 3299 of 2025 ------ Ranjan Gope, age 24 years, s/o Parshtan Yadav @ Parshtan Mahto, resident of Village- Childag (Hurhuri), P.O. & P.S.- Ratu, Dist.-Ranchi … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Ashok Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Azeemuddin, Addl. P.P. ------ Order No.02 Dated- 24.04.2025 Heard the parties. The petitioner has moved this Court for grant of bail in connection with Pithoria P.S. Case No.50 of 2022 registered for the offences punishable under sections 387/34 of the Indian Penal Code and under Section 17 of C.L.A. Act. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was demanding extortion being member of PLFI extremist organization. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false and the petitioner is not named in the FIR and only on the basis of the confessional statement of the co- accused, he has been implicated in this case. It is then submitted that without holding any T.I. Parade, charge sheet has been submitted. It is then submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 12.12.2024 as has been mentioned in paragraph no. 01 of the bail application. It is next submitted that the petitioner undertakes to cooperate with the trial of the case and further undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the informant or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be admitted to bail. The learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am inclined to enlarge the abovenamed petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M.-VI, Ranchi, in connection with Pithoria P.S. Case No.50 of 2022 with the condition that the petitioner will cooperate with the trial of the case and will furnish his mobile number and a copy of his Aadhar Card in the court below with the undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case, with further condition that he will not annoy or disturb the informant or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Sonu-Gunjan/