SMT SHIVANI AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS
WRIC/33216/2025 · 2025-10-05
Saurabh Srivastava
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 99309 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 99309 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 33216 of 2025 Court No. - 77 HON'BLE SAURABH SRIVASTAVA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioners and learned Standing Counsel for State.
2. At the very outset, learned counsel for petitioners submitted that no dispute is persisting between the parties and as such no cause of action survives.
3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. October 6, 2025 Shaswat Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Aditya Narayan Pandey, Brajesh Dube Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Saurabh Srivastava,J.) Smt Shivani And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SHASWAT SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad