TENGRIK M. SANGMA v. THE STATE OF MEGHALAYA AND ANR.
Crl.M.C./57/2025 · 2025-08-12
B Bhattacharjee, H S Thangkhiew
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 993 (MEG) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 993 (MEG) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
Serial No.06 Regular List HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG
Crl. M.C. No. 57 of 2025
Date of Decision: 12.08.2025
Shri. Tengrik M. Sangma Aged about 25 years S/o. Samuel M. Marak, R/o. Sategre, P.O. & P.S. – Dadenggre, West Garo Hills, Meghalaya.
… Appellant(s)/Applicant(s)
-Versus-
1. The State of Meghalaya, Represented by the Secretary Home Department, Government of Meghalaya, Shillong.
2. Shri. Mallen Marak, Son of Sri Riksin Sangma, R/o. Chigitchakgre, P.O. & P.S. - Dadenggre, West Garo Hills, Meghalaya.
… Opp. Party/Respondent(s)
Coram:
Hon’ble Mr. Justice H. S. Thangkhiew, Judge Hon’ble Mr. Justice B. Bhattacharjee, Judge
Appearance: For the Petitioner/Applicant(s) : Mr. R.Pahsyntiew, Adv.
For the Respondent(s)
: Mr. R.Gurung, GA for R 1.
Mr. S.A.Sheikh, Adv. for R 2.
2025:MLHC:717-DB
2
i) Whether approved for reporting in
Yes/No
Law journals etc:
ii) Whether approved for publication
Yes/No
in press:
Per. H.S. Thangkhiew, Judge: (ORAL)
1. Mr. S.A.Sheikh, learned counsel has entered appearance today on behalf of the respondent No. 2, as such, service is complete.
2. This is an application for condonation of delay of 70 days in filing the Appeal against the impugned Judgment dated 19-02-2025 and Order of Sentence dated 20.02.2025, passed by the learned Special Judge, (POCSO), West Garo Hills District, Tura in Special POCSO Case No. 40 of 2021, whereby the applicant/appellant has been convicted under Section-6 of the POCSO Act, 2012, sentenced to undergo 20(Twenty) years of rigorous imprisonment, accompanied with a fine.
3. We have perused the application for condonation, and we are satisfied that sufficient cause has been made out in explaining the delay.
4. Mr. R.Gurung, learned GA appearing for the respondent No. 1 and Mr. S.A.Sheikh, learned counsel for the respondent No. 2, also has no objection to the condonation, as prayed. 2025:MLHC:717-DB
3
5. Accordingly, the prayer is allowed and the delay of 70 days, is condoned. Registry to diarize and register the Appeal.
6. Misc. Case stands disposed of.
(B. Bhattacharjee)
(H.S. Thangkhiew) JUDGE
JUDGE
2025:MLHC:717-DB Digitally signed by SAMANTHA ANNA LIYA RYNJAH Date: 2025.08.12 04:51:28 IST