Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 11467 of 2025 Court No. - 37 HON'BLE CHANDRA KUMAR RAI, J.
1. Heard Ms. Tanushri Agrawal, learned counsel, holding the brief of Mrs. Rama Goel Bansal, learned for the petitioner.
2. The instant writ petition has been filed with a direction to the court of Prescribed Authority/A.C.J.M. (Senior Division), Court No.17, Prayagraj to decide the P.A. Case No.4/2017 (Shafeek Ahmad vs. Shiv Parson Vishwakarma), expeditiously.
3. Counsel for the petitioner states that the aforementioned P.A. Case No.4/2017 filed at the instance of the petitioner is pending even after expiry of more that 8 years. She further placed the certified copy of the order sheet of the pending proceeding, in order to demonstrate that the case is not proceeding expeditiously.
4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this petition is disposed of with the direction to Prescribed Authority/A.C.J.M. (Senior Division), Court No.17, Prayagraj to decide the aforesaid P.A. Case No.4/2017, as Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rama Goel Bansal, Shalini Goel Counsel for Respondent(s) :
Shafeek Ahmad .....Petitioner(s) Sri Shivparson Vishwakarma .....Respondent(s)
expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of 2 months, from the date of production of a certified copy of this order before the authority concerned, after affording proper opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned, in accordance with law. September 22, 2025 C.Prakash A227 No. 11467 of 2025 2 (Chandra Kumar Rai,J.) Digitally signed by :- CHANDRA PRAKASH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad