Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9927 (UTT)

MUKEEM (MINOR) v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPCRL/880/2024 · 2025-05-15

Pankaj Purohit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS WPCRL No.880 of 2024 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. Rajveer Singh, Advocate for the petitioner, through video conferencing. 2. Mr. Vipul Painuli, A.G.A. for the State. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he want to file a regular bail of the petitioner before the Juvenile Justice Board as per the provision of Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015. 4. In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the petition has rendered infructuous. 5. Accordingly writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 15.05.2025 SK