110 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-26710-2025 Date of Decision :09.09.2025 Ravi Rathee …Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and Ors ….Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA Present: Mr. Umesh Kumar Kanwar, Advocate for the petitioner. TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA, J. (ORAL) The petition has been filed seeking a writ of mandamus directing respondent no.2 to consider the petitioner’s representation dated 24.02.2025, Annexure P-5. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance raised herein is pending for appropriate decision before the respondents. At this stage, the petitioner will be satisfied in case respondent no.2 is directed to decide his pending representation, dated 24.02.2025, Annexure P-5, in a specified period. 3. Notice of motion. 4. Ms. Tanushree Gupta, Senior Deputy Advocate General, Haryana, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents-State and submits that the pending representation, dated 24.02.2025 will be decided by the second respondent/Director General Higher Education, by passing a speaking order in accordance with law within eight weeks. 5. In view of the statement made, learned counsel for the petitioner has no objection to the petition being disposed of in terms thereof. PUSHPINDER SAINI 2025.09.15 15:51 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-26710-2025 -2- 6. Ordered accordingly. 7. In case the order is not passed within the stipulated period, the officer concerned shall pay costs of `50,000 to the petitioner. (TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA) September 09, 2025 JUDGE ps Whether speaking/ reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No PUSHPINDER SAINI 2025.09.15 15:51 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document