HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 7741 of 2025 Court No. - 69 HON'BLE VIVEK VARMA, J. 1. Heard counsel for the applicant and Sri V.P. Tripathi, learned A.G.A. for the State- opposite party, and perused the material placed on record. 2. This application has been filed with the prayer to grant anticipatory bail to the applicant in Case Crime No. 276 of 2025, under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 191(1), 191(2), 109 B.N.S. and 7 Criminal Law Amendment Act, Police Station -Ijjat Nagar, District Bareilly. 3. Counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case. As per the first information report, two groups armed with lathi and danda were pelting stones at each other. In the alleged incident, one person from the side of the informant received injuries. The injuries were on non vital parts of the body and were found simple in nature. A vague and general role has been assigned to the applicant. It is next contended that it is a cross case, three persons from the side of the applicant also received injuries. The aggressor is still to be ascertained. At this stage there is no clarity with regard to the exact role of the applicant. The criminal history of the applicant has been explained in para no. 19 of the affidavit. It is next submitted that the applicant has apprehension of his arrest and in case, the applicant is released on anticipatory bail, he will not misuse the said liberty. 4. Learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail but could not satisfactorily dispute the aforesaid submissions from the record. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Sudarshan Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Ashutosh Yadav .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) 5. Counsel for the applicant further submits that the application for grant of anticipatory bail be confined only till the submission of police report. 6. Having regard to the submissions made, considering the nature of accusations and the fact that the injuries sustained by the injured Anil were on non vital parts of the body and were found simple in nature; a vague and general role has been assigned to the applicant; it is a cross case, three persons from the side of the applicant also received injuries; the aggressor is still to be ascertained; at this stage there is no clarity with regard to the exact role of the applicant; without commenting on merits of the case, I am of the opinion that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on anticipatory bail till the submission of police report. 7. In the event of arrest, the applicant- Ashutosh Yadav be released on anticipatory bail in the aforesaid case crime till the submission of police report, if any, under Section 193(3) B.N.S.S., on furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Station House Officer of the police station concerned with the following conditions:- (i) The applicant shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; (ii) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer; (iii) The applicant shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court and if he has passport, the same shall be deposited by him, before the S.S.P./S.P. concerned. 8. In default of any of the conditions, the Investigating Officer is at liberty to file appropriate application for cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to the applicant. 9. The Investigating Officer is directed to conclude the investigation of the present case in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within a period of three months from the date of production of a copy of this order independently without being prejudiced by any observation made by this NABAIL No. 7741 of 2025 2 Court while considering and deciding the present anticipatory bail application of the applicant. 10. The applicant is directed to produce a copy of this order before the S.S.P./S.P. concerned within ten days from today, who shall ensure the compliance of present order. 11. The application stands disposed of. September 22, 2025 Sachin Mishra NABAIL No. 7741 of 2025 3 (Vivek Varma,J.) Digitally signed by :- SACHIN MISHRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad