110-9824.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA-9824-2018 (O&M) Date of Decision: 12.05.2025 JEET SINGH AND OTHERS . . . .APPELLANTS Vs. BALWINDER SINGH AND OTHERS . . . . RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA Present: - None. DEEPAK GUPTA, J. On the last date of hearing, the following order was passed: - “A wrien request for adjournment has been received on behalf of learned counsel for the appellants as he is not well. Although, last opportunity had been granted on the last date of hearing, in the interest of jusce, one more opportunity is provided. Adjourned to 12.05.2025, making it clear that no further opportunity shall be provided. Registry is directed not to entertain any request for adjournment.” 2. It is clear from the aforesaid order that on the last date despite last opportunity, nobody had appeared for the appellants and an addi+onal opportunity had been granted making it clear that no further opportunity shall be provided. 3. In above circumstances, non-appearance for the appellants today clearly indicates that appellants are no longer interested in pursuing p. 1 PRIYANKA 2025.05.12 18:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document RSA-9824-2018 2025:PHHC:061890 this appeal. Not only this, even no applica+on for impleadment of the LRs has been moved +ll date. 3. Consequently, the present appeal is hereby dismissed in default for want of prosecu+on. 12.05.2025 Vivek (DEEPAK GUPTA) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes Whether reportable? No p. 2 PRIYANKA 2025.05.12 18:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document