SUBHASIS NANDY v. THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.
WPA/3346/2025 · 2025-04-25
Gaurang Kanth
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 9925 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 9925 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
25.04.2025 Sl. No. 06 Ct No. 3
SG
WPA 3346 of 2025
Subhasis Nandy
Vs The State of West Bengal & Ors.
Mr. Aurin Chakraborty Ms. Husna Ara
…for the petitioner
Mr. Dwaipayan Banerjee
Mr. Somesh Panja
Mr. S.P. Chowdhury
…for respondent nos.7, 8 & 9
Mr. Sandipan Banerjee
Mr. Ankit Sureka
…for the HMC
Mr. Saibal Acharya,
Mr. Syed Mosihar.
…for the State
1.
Learned Counsel for the respondent- Corporation, Mr. Banerjee, appears and states that a work-stop notice was issued on 09.07.2024, and a copy of the same was marked to the Officer-in-Charge, Jagacha P.S., Howrah. He further states that the respondent-Corporation will ensure that no unauthorized construction is carried out and they will proceed in accordance with law to demolish the said unauthorized construction, after affording an opportunity of hearing to the person concerned, in terms of Section 177. He further states that an order of demolition will be passed if the Corporation finds that
2 the person is carrying out illegal and unauthorized construction in violation of the building plan and without any sanctioned plan.
2. Mr. Banerjee states that they will make every endeavors to complete the due process as enumerated under the law within a period of eight weeks.
3.
Learned Counsel for the petitioner states that, in view of the said statement, he stands satisfied at this stage, since a stop work notice has already been issued and he expects the Corporation will act in accordance with law if any illegal or unauthorized construction is found on the said plot.
4. In view of the above statement made by the
learned Counsel for the Respondent Corporation, the present writ petition is disposed of.
5. Since no affidavits have been filed by the respondents, the allegations made in the writ petition shall not be deemed to have been admitted.
6. There shall be no order as to costs.
7. Let urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties on usual undertaking. (Gaurang Kanth, J.)