Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 99232 (ALL)

KANAK SRIVASTAVA v. State of UP AND 2 OTHERS

WRIC/31789/2024 · 2025-01-24

Shekhar B Saraf, Vipin Chandra Dixit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:12901-DB Court No. - 40 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 31789 of 2024 Petitioner :- Kanak Srivastava Respondent :- State Of Up And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Kamlesh Kumar Yadav,Piyush Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Udit Chandra Hon'ble Shekhar B. Saraf,J. Hon'ble Vipin Chandra Dixit,J. 1. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State. 2. Upon hearing the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties, we are of the view that petitioner should file an application under Clause 6.5 of the U.P. Electricity Supply Code, 2005. In the event such an application is made by the petitioner within a period of two weeks, the authorities are directed to grant an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and thereafter pass an order in accordance with law within a period of eight weeks from the date of filing of the application. 3. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 24.1.2025 Kpy (Vipin Chandra Dixit, J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf, J.) Digitally signed by :- KAVLESHWAR PRASAD YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad