HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 529 BNSS No. - 3484 of 2025 Court No. - 83 HON'BLE AVNISH SAXENA, J. 1. Sri Rahul Pandey, learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 has filed the vakalatnama, the same is taken on record. 2. Heard Sri Praveen Singh, learned counsel for the applicant, learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 and learned A.G.A. for the State. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant and opposite party no.2 are husband and wife, whose matrimonial discord has been amicably resolved as such, seeks interference of this Court in speeding up the matter pending before the court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No.16, Allahabad, Case No.1585 of 2023 (Smt. Chitra Pandey Vs. Arjun Pandey) under Section 12 of Domestic Violence Act, Police Station Dhoomanganj, District Prayagraj. It is further submitted that the applicant has already preferred an application under Section 528 B.N.S.S. No.13448 of 2025 (Arjun Pandey Vs. State of U.P. and another), which is pending. He further submits that the petition under Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 has been allowed and the amount of permanent alimony of Rs.15 lakhs is already deposited before the Registrar of this Court. 4. Learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 admits the contention of the learned counsel for the applicant. 5. Learned A.G.A. for the State submits that the matter is matrimonial in nature and the parties have already entered into compromise. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Abhishe Pandey, Praveen Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Arjun Pandey .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) 6. On further query, learned counsel for the applicant submits that the court, wherein the case is pending, is vacant. He further submits that neither the application under Section 528 B.N.S.S. contain the details of the present case nor the present relief has been sought in that matter. It is, therefore, prayed that the matter detailed above be decided on the basis of compromise. 7. This Court has taken into consideration the rival submissions made by the parties and is of the view that the matter being matrimonial in nature and ended in compromise. As such, all the cases arose out of matrimonial dispute shall be given quietus at an early date. 8. Let the Case No.1585 of 2023 (Smt. Chitra Pandey Vs. Arjun Pandey), under Section 12 of Domestic Violence Act, Police Station Dhoomanganj, District Prayagraj be decided within a month in terms of the compromise entered into between the parties. 9. In case the court is vacant, the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Prayagraj shall exercise his jurisdiction to transfer the case to the court of competent jurisdiction, to carry out order. 10. Hence, the application is accordingly disposed of. October 6, 2025 Shivangi NA529 No. 3484 of 2025 2 (Avnish Saxena,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHIVANGI YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad