Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 125
NAVI ESTATES LLP
STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS
CORAM: HON’BLE
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE
Present: Mr.
ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL, J. (ORAL)
Learned counsel for the charging interest/pena development charges which is unj calculation has not been set out by the representation dated 24.12.2024 (Annexure the petition be disposed of with a direction to decide the same in a time bound manner.
2.
Issue notice to the r
3.
At the asking of the Court, Mr. Deepak Bhardwaj, Advocate General, Haryana
4.
Heard.
5.
The to consider and decide the representatio within a period of 3 months
10.09.2025 SwarnjitS
Whether speaking/reasoned
Whether reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP-26796-2025
DATE OF DECISION:
NAVI ESTATES LLP
Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK MANCHANDA Mr. Amit Aggarwal, Advocate for the petitioner.
ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL, J. (ORAL)
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondents are ging interest/penal interest on account of delay in payment of external charges which is unjustified. He further submits that t not been set out by the respondent dated 24.12.2024 (Annexure P-12) be disposed of with a direction to respondent decide the same in a time bound manner. Issue notice to the respondents. At the asking of the Court, Mr. Deepak Bhardwaj, Advocate General, Haryana accepts notice on behalf of respondents. Heard. The petition stands disposed of with consider and decide the representation dated 24.12.2024 (Annexure hin a period of 3 months from now in accordance with law.
(ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL)
(DEEPAK MANCHANDA
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable
: Yes / No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 2025 DATE OF DECISION: 10.09.2025
… Petitioner (s)
... Respondent(s) MR. JUSTICE ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL DEEPAK MANCHANDA , Advocate for the petitioner.
petitioner submits that the respondents are on account of delay in payment of external He further submits that the detailed respondents. The petitioner has sent a 12) in this regard and submits that respondent No.2 to consider and At the asking of the Court, Mr. Deepak Bhardwaj, Additional accepts notice on behalf of respondents.
disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 n dated 24.12.2024 (Annexure P-12) in accordance with law.
(ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL)
JUDGE DEEPAK MANCHANDA) JUDGE Yes / No Yes / No
petitioner submits that the respondents are on account of delay in payment of external detailed ent a and submits that to consider and Additional a direction to respondent No.2 12) SWARNJIT SINGH 2025.09.10 16:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document