Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 99207 (MAD)

T.SUCHITHRA v. THE ZONAL OFFICER

WP/36966/2025 · 2025-10-08

G Arul Murugan

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P.No.36966 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 08.10.2025 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN W.P.No.36966 of 2025 T.Suchithra W/o.M.Dinesh Kumar No.12/161A, 'B' Block, 6th Main 1st Cross Street, Thanikachalam Nagar, Ponniammanmedu, Chennai-600 110 Rep. by her Power of Attorney Agent N.K.Selva Kumar, S/o.N.Kotti, No.46. Venkatesan Nagar, VOC Street, G.K.M. Colony Jawahar Nagar, Chennai-600 082 Petitioner Vs 1.The Zonal Officer Zone-3, Corporation of Chennai Madhavaram, Chennai 2.The Assistant Engineer Zone-3, Ward 29, Corporation of Chennai Thanikachalam Nagar 'B' Block, Chennai-600 110. ______________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.36966 of 2025 3.K.Subramani S/o.Kittusamy Pillai, No.14, 6th Main Road, 1st Cross Street, B Block, Ponniamman Medu, Chennai-600 110 Respondents PRAYER : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus direct the 1st and 2nd respondents to dispose of the representation dated 04.08.2025 given by the petitioner through her Power of Attorney agent within the time frame stipulated by this Hon'ble Court. For Petitioner: Mr.J.Chelladurai Caldwell For Respondents: Mr.D.B.R.Prabhu Standing Counsel for respondent Nos.1 and 2 ORDER (Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice) Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The allegation that, while raising construction, the private respondent has not left open spaces is essentially a matter for consideration of the Corporation, which had granted building ______________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.36966 of 2025 permission. 3. The petitioner claims to be a person residing adjacent to the plot of respondent No.3. That by itself will not give her locus. 4. Leaving it open for the Corporation to consider the grievance ventilated in the representations of the petitioner in accordance with law, the writ petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. (MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CJ) (G.ARUL MURUGAN,J) 08.10.2025 Index : Yes/No Neutral Citation : Yes/No bbr To: 1.The Zonal Officer Zone-3, Corporation of Chennai Madhavaram, Chennai 2.The Assistant Engineer Zone-3, Ward 29, Corporation of Chennai Thanikachalam Nagar B Block, Chennai-600 110. ______________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.36966 of 2025 THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE AND G.ARUL MURUGAN,J. bbr W.P.No.36966 of 2025 08.10.2025 ______________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis