HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU Case No. WP(C) No. 3776/2025 Mehran Anjum Mir …..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s) Through: Ms. Sameena Kousar, Adv. vs J&K Bank Ltd. and anr. .…. Respondent(s) Through: Mr. Ajay Kr. Gandotra, Adv. Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNESH OSWAL, JUDGE HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE MOKSHA KHAJURIA KAZMI, JUDGE ORDER 30.12.2025 Oral 1. Pursuant to query of this Court, as to whether notice issued by the respondent-Bank under section 13(2) of the J&K SARFAESI Act has been assailed by the petitioner or not, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has not been provided with any such notice. 2. At this stage, Mr. Ajay Kumar Gandotra, entered appearance on behalf of the respondent-Bank, submits that notice under section 13(2) dated 03.03.2025 of the J&K SARFAESI Act was served upon the petitioner and subsequent notice under section 13(4) of the J&K SARFAESI Act dated 24.07.2025 was also served upon the petitioner. 3. In response thereof, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has not received any such notice(s) from the respondent-Bank. Serial No. 31 WP(C) No. 3776/2025 Page 2 of 2 4. Mr. Gandotra, learned counsel for the respondent-Bank submits that despite the fact that the notices have been served upon the petitioner and published in the newspaper, still the respondent-Bank shall provide the copies of aforementioned notices, provided the petitioner approaches the respondent-Bank. 5. Faced with this situation, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks withdrawal of the instant petition with liberty to avail appropriate remedy as available under law. 6. Disposed of. (MOKSHA KHAJURIA KAZMI) (RAJNESH OSWAL) JUDGE JUDGE Jammu 30.12.2025 Rakesh Rakesh Kumar 2025.12.30 15:44 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document