HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 11629 of 2025 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1.Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to incorporate the necessary correction during course of the day. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Harshit Pandey, l earned counsel for the respondent and perused the record. 3. This petition has been filed for following relief: "Direct the Learned Court i.e. A.C.J. (J.D.) 4, Kanpur Nagar to decide the Case No. 30 of 2013 (Bankey Khan and others Vs. State of U.P. and others), Pending in the court of Civil Judge (Junior Division), within a stipulated period may be fixed by the Hon'ble Court." 4. Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the suit is pending since 2013. It is further submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that several dates have been fixed but the same has not been decided yet. He prayed that the same may be decided expeditiously. 5. No useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending. 6. Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of finally Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Maheshwari Prasad Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Harshit Pandey Saleem Khan .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) with a direction to the A.C.J. (J.D.) 4, Kanpur Nagar to consider and decide the aforesaid case, in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of eighteen months from the date of production of a certified copy of this order after ensuring service upon all the parties concerned and after giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned as well as opportunity to lead evidence in support of their case and without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties provided that there is no other legal impediment. September 24, 2025 Ved Prakash A227 No. 11629 of 2025 2 (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Digitally signed by :- VED PRAKASH SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad