JUBAIDUR RAHMAN v. ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER (JUDICIAL) PRAYAGRAJ DIVISION PRAYAGRAJ AND 8 OTHERS
WRIC/33460/2025 · 2025-09-22
Rohit Ranjan Agarwal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 99183 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 99183 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 33460 of 2025 Court No. - 34 HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J.
1. This writ petition has been filed with the following prayer:-
"i. Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent no. 1 (Additional Commissioner (Judicial) Prayagraj Division Prayagraj) to decide the revision no. 00813/2020 and Computerized no. C 202002000000813, Hari Lal & anothers versus Uabaidur Rahman & anothers, of the under section 333 U.P. Zamidari Vinash Adhiniyam 1950, pending before respondent no.1, otherwise the petitioner shall be suffer irreparable loss and injury."
2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that against the order passed under Section 176 of U.P. Z.A. and L.R. Act, 1950, revision has been filed under Section 333 of the Act of 1950 which is pending consideration before respondent no. 1 since 2020. The sole prayer made in the writ petition is for expeditious disposal of the same.
3. As no useful purpose would be served in keeping the matter pending, the writ petition is being disposed of, at the admission stage, without calling for counter affidavit or issuing notice to private respondents, with a direction upon respondent no. 1 to decide the Revision No. 00813/2020, Computerized No. C202002000000813, Hari Lal & another versus Uabaidur Rahman & another, in accordance with law, after hearing all affected parties, preferably within a period of two months from the date of production of certified copy of this order. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sudhir Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : Azad Rai, C.S.C. Jubaidur Rahman .....Petitioner(s) Additional Commissioner (Judicial) Prayagraj Division Prayagraj And 8 Others .....Respondent(s)
4. With the aforesaid directions, writ petition stands disposed of.
5. It is made clear that this Court has not adjudicated the matter on merits. September 23, 2025 V.S.Singh WRIC No. 33460 of 2025 2 (Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.) Digitally signed by :- VIDYA SAGAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad