BILAL HUSSAIN v. UT OF J AND K TH COMMISSIONER SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, JAMMU AND OTHERS
WP(C)/2937/2025 · 2025-10-18
Wasim Sadiq Nargal
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 9918 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 9918 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
WP(C) No.2937/2025
Bilal Hussain
..... Petitioner(s)
Through :- Mr. Azhar Usman Khan, Advocate
Vs
Union Territory of J&K and others
.....Respondent(s)
Through :- Ms. Chetna Manhas, Assisting Counsel to Mrs. Monika Kohli, Sr. AAG
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE
ORDER 18.10.2025
After arguing for a while, when the confronted with the maintainability of the instant petition, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks withdrawal of the instant petition with liberty to seek appropriate remedy under law.
In view of the above, the instant writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
(WASIM SADIQ NARGAL)
JUDGE
JAMMU 18.10.2025 Shammi Sr. No. 66 SHAMMI KUMAR 2025.10.18 15:29 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document