Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 99175 (PAT)

Sanjit Ray v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./36253/2025 · 2025-08-20

S B P Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 36253 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-15 Year-2025 Thana- BACHHWARA District- Begusarai ====================================================== Sanjit Ray S/o Jagdish Ram @ Jagdish Ray R/o Vill- Ward No. 01, Samsipur, P.S.- Bachhwara, Distt- Begusarai ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Anil Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Umeshanand Pandit ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. B. PD. SINGH ORAL ORDER 3 20-08-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. 2. The instant application for anticipatory bail has been filed by the petitioner apprehending his arrest in connec- tion with Bachhwara P.S. Case no. 15 of 2025 instituted for the offence under Sections 127(1), 115(2), 117(2), 109, 303(2), 351, 351(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S.S. 3. As per allegation in the FIR, over the dispute of partition of land which was in the name of parents of both par- ties, brother of the informant, namely, Jagdish Ray became furi- ous and assaulted the informant by means of danda and co-ac- cused Lali Ray inflicted dab blow on the head of informant’s son. Thereafter, petitioner also inflicted garasa blow on the in- formant’s son as a result of which, he was taken to primary Patna High Court CR. MISC. No. 36253 of 2025(3) dt.20-08-2025 2/3 health center from where for better treatment, he was referred to Begusarai Hospital. 4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the peti- tioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has commit- ted no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case with a view to grab his share. 5. Learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer of Bail and submitted that petitioner has assaulted the informant’s son by means of garasa blow on his right teple, which is a vital organ. 6. There is direct and specific allegation against the petitioner to inflicting garasa blow on the right side of the tem- ple of informant’s son, namely, Jaychandra Ray. Injury report is brought on record from which it appears that injured has re- ceived grievous injury on his right temple and it also supports the prosecution story. Investigation of the case is still going on. 7. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the fact that there is direct and specific allegation against the petitioner of inflicting garasa blow on temple of the informant’s son, which is grievous in nature, this Court is not in- clined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. 8. Accordingly, prayer for grant of anticipatory bail Patna High Court CR. MISC. No. 36253 of 2025(3) dt.20-08-2025 3/3 stands rejected. 9. Petitioner is directed to surrender before the learned lower court and pray for regular bail, which may be considered on its own merit without being prejudiced by the order of this Court. sushma/- (S. B. Pd. Singh, J) U