IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 108-1 CRM-M-56483-2023 Date of Decision: 28.08.2025 HARVINDER SINGH @ BACHI ......... Peoner Versus STATE OF PUNJAB ......... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA Present Mr. Ketan Chopra, Advocate for the peoner. Ms. Pooja Nayar Sharma, D.A.G., Punjab. Mr. Charanpreet Singh, Advocate for the complainant. (through video conferencing). **** ANOOP CHITKARA, J. (ORAL) FIR No. Dated Police Sta3on Sec3ons 49 17.06.2023 Jodhan, District Ludhiana Rural 307, 323, 427, 341, 34 IPC The peoner incarcerated in the FIR caponed above, has come up before this Court under Secon 439 CrPC seeking regular bail. 2. Counsel for the complainant submits that the vicm is sll unconscious and is in COMA and one of his legs has been amputated. 3. At this stage, counsel for the peoner submits that he would be contended and sasfied if trial be expedited and wants to withdraw the present peon. 4. Given the prolonged custody and coupled with the medical condion of the vicm, no case for bail is made out. However, generally this Court refrains from issue direcon to trial Court to decide trial in a me bound manner but keeping in view the custody period of peoner, it would be in the interest of jusce, if trial is expedited 5. Given above, the present peon stands disposed of as having been withdrawn and this Court requests the trial Court to decide the trial expediously in accordance with law, if possible, as vicm is in COMA. All pending miscellaneous applicaons, if any, stand disposed of. (ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE 28.08.2025/Jyo -II Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No. JYOTI 2025.09.01 15:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.