Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9917 (RAJ)

PRABHU DAYAL S/O SOHAN LAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/3266/2025 · 2025-07-07

Sudesh Bansal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:25141] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3266/2025 1. Prabhu Dayal S/o Sohan Lal, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Phalanwali, Tehsil Pugal, District Bikaner, Rajasthan. 2. Yogesh Kumar S/o Ramesh Kumar, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Ward No. 1, Rcp Colony, 2 Mld-A, Gharsana, Sriganganagar, Rajasthan. 3. Bhanwar Singh S/o Abhay Singh, Aged About 47 Years, R/o Jhjheu, Bikaner, Rajasthan. 4. Ramswaroop Choudhary S/o Keshar Lal Choudhary, Aged About 45 Years, R/o Village Jhopadiya, Post Bhankrota, Tehsil Madhorajpura, District Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, School Education Department, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur 2. The Director, Elementary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner 3. The Director, Directorate Of Literacy And Continuing Education, Shiksha Sankul, Jln Marg, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 4. The District Literacy And Continuing Education Officer, Jaipur. 5. The District Collector And Chairman, District Redressal Committee (Literacy), Jaipur. 6. The District Literacy And Continuing Education Officer, Bikaner. 7. The District Collector And Chairman, District Redressal Committee (Literacy), Bikaner. 8. The District Literacy And Continuing Education Officer, Sriganganagar. 9. The District Collector And Chairman, District Redressal Committee (Literacy), Sriganganagar. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Aamir Khan for Mr. Ram Pratap Saini For Respondent(s) : Mr. BS Chhaba, AAG [2025:RJ-JP:25141] (2 of 2) [CW-3266/2025] HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL Order 07/07/2025 1. Counsel for petitioners states that in furtherance to the order dated 02.05.2025 passed by this Court, charge-sheets to the petitioners have already been issued and they are facing departmental enquiry. 2. The aforesaid fact is taken on record. 3. The instant writ petition has already been dismissed as withdrawn vide order dated 02.05.2025, hence, no further order is required to be passed. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition be consigned to record. (SUDESH BANSAL),J RONAK JAIMAN/30