HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 14384 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE SAURABH SHYAM SHAMSHERY, J. 1. Heard Sri Ijamamul Hak, learned counsel for petitioner and Sri R.V. Pandey, Advocate for Respondents-2 to 4. 2. Petitioner has claimed that he is working as a Casual Labour since 2012, however, appointment letter or nature of payment of salary, are not on record. Petitioner has not made out a case that there is any relationship of employer and employee between petitioner and Respondent-Bank, therefore, prayer to issue a mandamus to consider the representation of petitioner and allow him to work as a Casual Labour, cannot be granted. 3. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed. September 23, 2025 AK Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ijamamul Hak, Mohd. Israr Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., R.V. Pandey (Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.) Arvind Kumar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- AWADESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad