Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 99148 (ALL)

ANAMIKA v. UNION OF INDIA AND 4 OTHERS

CRLP/21423/2025 · 2025-09-21

Salil Kumar Rai, Zafeer Ahmad

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 21423 of 2025 Court No. - 45 HON'BLE SALIL KUMAR RAI, J. HON'BLE ZAFEER AHMAD, J. Heard the counsel for the petitioner, the A.S.G.I. representing the respondent no. 1 and the A.G.A. for the respondent Nos. 2 to 4. The present petition has been filed for the following relief:- "i) Issue, a writ or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding/directing that the investigation in Case Crime No. 125 of 2025 be entrusted to CBCID or CBI, so as to ensure an unbiased, transparent and scientific investigation into the heinous offences committed against the deceased and to protect the petitioner from further intimidation and injustice." In Paragraph nos. 15 to 17 of its judgment in Sakiri Vasu vs. State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors. (2008) 2 SCC 409, the Supreme Court has observed as follows : - "15. Section 156(3) provides for a check by the Magistrate on the police performing its duties under Chapter XII Cr.P.C. In cases where the Magistrate finds that the police has not done its duty of investigating the case at all, or has not done it satisfactorily, he can issue a direction to the police to do the investigation properly, and can monitor the same. 16. The power in the Magistrate to order further investigation under Section 156(3) is an independent power, and does not affect the power of the investigating officer to further investigate the case even after Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Dinesh Kumar Yadav, Krishna Prakash Counsel for Respondent(s) : A.S.G.I., G.A. Anamika .....Petitioner(s) Union Of India And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) submission of his report vide Section 173(8). Hence the Magistrate can order re-opening of the investigation even after the police submits the final report, vide State of Bihar vs. J.A.C. Saldanha (SCC : AIR para 19). 17. In our opinion Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. is wide enough to include all such powers in a Magistrate which are necessary for ensuring a proper investigation, and it includes the power to order registration of an F.I.R. and of ordering a proper investigation if the Magistrate is satisfied that a proper investigation has not been done, or is not being done by the police. Section 156(3) Cr.P.C., though briefly worded, in our opinion, is very wide and it will include all such incidental powers as are necessary for ensuring a proper investigation." The provisions in B.N.S.S., 2023 which corresponds to Section 156(3) of Cr.P.C. is Section 175(3) of B.N.S.S. In case, the petitioner has any grievance against the manner in which the investigation is being conducted, the petitioner has the remedy to approach the concerned Magistrate under Section 175(3) of B.N.S.S. / Section 156(3) of Cr.P.C. It is not a case for interference by this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, at this stage. The writ petition is dismissed. September 22, 2025 Ranjeet Sahu CRLP No. 21423 of 2025 2 (Zafeer Ahmad,J.) (Salil Kumar Rai,J.) Digitally signed by :- RANJEET SAHU High Court of Judicature at Allahabad