Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9914 (UTT)

PIRYYANKA POKHRIYAL v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPCRL/1618/2022 · 2025-07-07

Pankaj Purohit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS WPCRL No.1618 of 2022 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. Sushil Kumar, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Nalin Saun, Advocate for the petitioner. 2. Mr. S.C. Dumka, AGA with Ms. Sweta Dobhal, Brief Holder for the State. 3. Learned counsel for the State informed this Court that after investigation, charge- sheet has been filed against the petitioner on 12.12.2022. 4. This fact has not been disputed by the learned counsel for the petitioner as well. 5. In view of the counter affidavit filed by the State stating therein that the charge-sheet has been filed against the petitioner. Therefore, this criminal writ petition has become infructuous and the same is, accordingly, dismissed as such. 6. However, it is open to the petitioner to challenge the charge-sheet in appropriate proceedings, before the appropriate forum. 7. Pending application, if any, stands disposed of accordingly. (Pankaj Purohit J.) 07.07.2025 Ravi