Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 99139 (MAD)

SELVARAJU v. The Superintendent of Police

WP Crl./890/2025 · 2025-09-19

N Sathish Kumar

Writ Petition (Criminal)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P.(Crl.) No.890 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 19.09.2025 CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE N. SATHISH KUMAR W.P.(Crl.) No.890 of 2025 Selvaraju ... Petitioner Vs. 1. The Superintendent of Police Kallakurichi District 2. The Inspector of Police Chinnasalem, Kallakurichi District 3. Sivakumar ... Respondents PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 and 2 to consider the petitioner's representation dated 16.11.2023, 26.05.2025 and 31.05.2025 consequently direct the respondents 1 and 2 to take necessary action on the 3rd respondent under the Tamilnadu Prohibition of Charging Exorbitant Interest Act 2003 to cancel the sale deed Doc.No.1693/2015. For Petitioner : Mr.S.N.Subramani For Respondents 1 & 2 : Mr.R.Vinothraja Government Advocate (Crl. Side) 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(Crl.) No.890 of 2025 O R D E R This Writ Petition (Criminal) has been filed to direct the respondents 1 and 2 to consider the petitioner's representation dated 16.11.2023, 26.05.2025 and 31.05.2025 and to take necessary action against the 3rd respondent under the Tamilnadu Prohibition of Charging Exorbitant Interest Act 2003 and to cancel the sale deed Doc.No.1693/2015. 2. The case of the petitioner is that in a loan transaction, he executed a sale deed in favour of the respondent and the respondent also executed a reconveyance agreement to reconvey the property on repayment of loan amount with interest. However, now the respondent refuses to reconvey the property. 3. At the outset, this Court is of the view that it is a case of civil dispute and if at all there is any reconveyance agreement, the police machinery cannot be used to settle the dispute as it has to be established before the Civil Court. This Court finds no merits in this petition. 4. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed. 19.09.2025 ksa-2 Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation:Yes/No 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(Crl.) No.890 of 2025 To 1. The Superintendent of Police Kallakurichi District 2. The Inspector of Police Chinnasalem, Kallakurichi District 3. The Public Prosecutor High Court of Madras, Chennai 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(Crl.) No.890 of 2025 N. SATHISH KUMAR , J. ksa-2 W.P.(Crl.) No.890 of 2025 19.09.2025 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis