PRAMOD KUMAR v. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 16 OTHERS
WRIC/33484/2025 · 2025-09-22
Rohit Ranjan Agarwal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 99136 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 99136 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 33484 of 2025 Court No. - 34 HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J.
1. This writ petition has been filed with the following prayers:-
"1. issue an appropriate writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent No.2 to decide the impleadment application dated 06.12.2022 filed by the petitioner and respondent No. 6 to 17 in Appeal No.1439 of 2022, Computer Case No.C20220100001439 (Swami Adaitanand Memorial Purva Madhyamic Vidyalaya Versus State of U. P.) arising out of proceeding U / s - 38(2) Uttar Pradesh Land Revenue Act 2006, pending before the court of Commissioner Agra Division, Agra, within stipulated as period fixed by this Hon'ble Court.
2. issue an appropriate writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent No.2 to decide the Appeal No.1439 of 2022, Computer Case No.C20220100001439 (Swami Adaitanand Memorial Purva Madhyamic Vidyalaya Versus State of U. P.) arising out of proceeding U/s-38(2) Uttar Pradesh Land Revenue Act - 2006, pending before the court of Commissioner Agra Division, Agra, within stipulated as period fixed by this Hon'ble Court,."
2. It is contended that an impleadment application has been filed in proceedings under Section 38(2) of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 which is pending consideration. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the said impleadment application may be decided expeditiously.
3. As no useful purpose would be served in keeping the matter pending, or calling for counter affidavit, the matter is being disposed of, at the admission stage, with a direction upon authority concerned to decide the impleadment application dated 06.12.2022 filed in proceedings under Section 38(2) of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, after hearing all the concerned parties, strictly in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within a period of one month from the date of production of certified copy of this order. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Pankaj Kumar, Punya Sheel Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : Avinash Chandra Srivastava, C.S.C. Pramod Kumar .....Petitioner(s) State Of Uttar Pradesh And 16 Others .....Respondent(s)
With the aforesaid direction, present writ petition stands disposed of. It is made clear that this Court has not adjudicated the case on merit. September 23, 2025 SK Goswami WRIC No. 33484 of 2025 2 (Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHIVAKANT GOSWAMI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad