Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 99130 (PNJ)

SUMAN GUPTA v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

CWP/26672/2025 · 2025-09-08

Deepak Sibal, Lapita Banerji

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CWP-26672-2025 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT Suman Gupta State of Haryana CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA Present : Mr. for the petitioner. Mr. DEEPAK SIBAL Through this petition, the petitioner seeks issuance of a direction to respondent No.3 to decide the petitioner’s application for grant of Change of Land Use. At the outset, learned State counsel submits that the aforesaid application of the pe dated 19.06.2025, shall be decided by respondent No.3 within six weeks from today. The afore statement satisfies the learned counsel for the petitioner. Disposed of. September 08 vandana Whether speaking/reasoned : Whether reportable : 2025 (O&M) Sr. No.154 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-26672 Date of Decision : Versus Haryana and others HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA Mr. Divyam Dhakla, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Saurabh Mago, DAG, Haryana. *** DEEPAK SIBAL, J. (Oral) Through this petition, the petitioner seeks issuance of a direction to respondent No.3 to decide the petitioner’s application for grant of Change of At the outset, learned State counsel submits that the aforesaid application of the petitioner, after its remand by respondent No.1 through order dated 19.06.2025, shall be decided by respondent No.3 within six weeks from The afore statement satisfies the learned counsel for the petitioner. Disposed of. (DEEPAK SIBAL JUDGE (LAPITA BANERJI) JUDGE September 08, 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No p. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT 26672-2025 (O&M) Date of Decision : 08.09.2025 …Petitioner …Respondents DEEPAK SIBAL HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Through this petition, the petitioner seeks issuance of a direction to respondent No.3 to decide the petitioner’s application for grant of Change of At the outset, learned State counsel submits that the aforesaid titioner, after its remand by respondent No.1 through order dated 19.06.2025, shall be decided by respondent No.3 within six weeks from The afore statement satisfies the learned counsel for the petitioner. DEEPAK SIBAL) JUDGE (LAPITA BANERJI) JUDGE VANDANA 2025.09.11 09:37 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document