Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 99120 (ALL)

ADITYA KUMAR KULSHRESTHA v. UP POWER CORPORATION LTD AND 3 OTHERS

WRIA/14471/2025 · 2025-09-23

Saurabh Shyam Shamshery

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 14471 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE SAURABH SHYAM SHAMSHERY, J. 1. Heard Sri Sheo Ram Singh, learned counsel for petitioner, Ms. Kritika Sinha, Advocate holding brief of Sri Abhishek Srivastava, learned counsel for Respondent-1 and Sri Om Prakash Mishra, Advocate for Respondents-2 to 4. 2. Learned counsel for respondents fairly submits that since this Court has already passed a recent judgment in Praveen Vashistha and others vs. State of U.P. and others, 2025:AHC:166051, whereby impugned orders relating to selection process of the year 2004 are set aside, therefore, its benefit will also applicable to present petitioner that he may continue to work on promoted post. 3. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that petitioner is not getting pecuniary benefit on promoted post, therefore, this writ petition may be disposed of with liberty to petitioner to raise his grievance before concerned authority. 4. In view of above, taking note of judgment passed in Praveen Vashistha (supra) as well as with aforesaid liberty, this writ petition is disposed of. In case any representation is filed by petitioner, the same be decided expeditiously in accordance with law. September 24, 2025 AK Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Shashank Shekhar, Sheo Ram Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : Abhishek Srivastava, C.S.C., Om Prakash Mishra (Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.) Aditya Kumar Kulshrestha .....Petitioner(s) Up Power Corporation Ltd And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- AWADESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad