122 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.26602 of 2025 (O&M) Date of Decision: 10.09.2025 SURAJ AND OTHERS .....Petitioners Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ........Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK MANCHANDA Present: Mr. Babbar Bhan, Advocate, Mr. Jagdeep Singh Rana, Advocate, Mr. Lokendra Singh, Advocate and Mr. Arvind Kumar Bangar, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Deepak Bhardwaj, Advocate for the respondents. **** ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL, J. (Oral) The petitioners are seeking a direction to the respondents to rehabilitate the petitioners before evicting them from the site. 2. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that the exercise for removal of the encroachments is being carried out by them in pursuance to the directions dated 16.01.2025 issued by this Court in CWP-28729-2013. He, upon instructions from Mr. Lalit Hans, Junior Engineer, EO-1, submits that only 84 petitioners out of 207 petitioners have been found to be eligible for allotment of a flat under the Aashiana Scheme. He has furnished a list of eligible families/applicants in this regard, which is taken on record. He upon instructions further submits that the demolition drive would not be carried out for another 15 days in view of the inclement weather. SANDEEP KUMAR 2025.09.10 16:37 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CWP No.26602 of 2025 (O&M) -2- 3. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that he may be permitted to withdraw this petition with liberty to seek recourse to the alternative remedy in accordance with law. 4. The petition stands dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. (ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL) JUDGE (DEEPAK MANCHANDA) JUDGE 10.09.2025 sandeep Whether Speaking/Reasoned : Yes/No Whether Reportable : Yes/No SANDEEP KUMAR 2025.09.10 16:37 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.