Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9910 (HP)

KULDEEP KUMAR ALIAS KAPIL v. STATE OF HP

CRMPM/761/2025 · 2025-04-09

Sushil Kukreja, Tarlok Singh Chauhan

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Kuldeep Kumar @ Kapil Vs. State of H.P. Cr.MP(M) No.761/2025 in Cr.Appeal No._____/2025 09.04.2025. Present: Mr. Udit Shaurya Kaushik, Advocate, for the applicant/appellant. Mr. Anup Rattan, A.G., with Mr. Navlesh Verma, Addl.A.G, for the respondent-State. Cr. MP(M) No. 761/2025 For the reasons stated in the application, coupled with the fact that the applicant/appellant is in jail, we find sufficient cause to condone the delay of 88 days that has crept up in filing the appeal. Ordered accordingly. The application stands disposed of. Cr. Appeal No. /2025 Appeal be registered. Heard. Admit. Call for the records. Cr.MPST No. 2283/2025 Application be registered. ... 2.. Notice. Mr. Navlesh Verma, learned Additional Advocate General, accepts service of notice on behalf of the respondent. He prays for and is granted three weeks’ time to file reply to the application. List on 07.05.2025. (Tarlok Singh Chauhan) Judge (Sushil Kukreja) Judge April 09, 2025 (mamta)