HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 33502 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J. HON'BLE PRAVEEN KUMAR GIRI, J. 1. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent Nos.1 to 3, Mr. Gaurav Tripathi, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent Nos.4 to 6 and Mr. Baleshwar Chaturvedi, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent Nos.7 and 8. 2. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India wherein the petitioner is aggrieved by the inaction on the part of the respondent authorities in considering his representation dated August 20, 2025. 3. Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has made a representation dated August 20, 2025 for reconnecting his electricity connection but till date no order has been passed on the aforesaid representation of the petitioner. 4. Upon hearing the counsel appearing on behalf of the parties, we are of the view that the prayer of the petitioner is innocuous and the same may be granted. 5. Accordingly, the Manager, Torrent Power Limited, Agra, being the respondent No.4 herein, is directed to consider and decide the aforesaid representation of the petitioner by means of a reasoned after granting an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. The entire exercise should be completed within a period of one week from date. 6. With the above directions, the writ petition is disposed of. September 23, 2025 Rakesh Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Devashish Tripathi, Rajiv Dwivedi Counsel for Respondent(s) : Baleshwar Chaturvedi, C.S.C., Gaurav Tripathi (Praveen Kumar Giri,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Ramesh Chandra Dixit @ Babi .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 7 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAKESH MEHTA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad