HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 33318 of 2025 Court No. - 33 HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J. 1. This writ petition has been filed with the following prayer:- "i) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 to correct the revenue record and mention Bhagwan Das Jaiswal son of Late Jamuna Prasad, Director Shakti Colonizers Pvt Ltd Jubkilee Road Gorakhpur in place of S.K.P.L Bhagwan Das Jaiswal son of Late Jamuna Prasad Jaiswal in Arazi No.115 Mi. Rakba 40500 sq. fit situated in Arazi Chhavni, Civil Lines, Gorakhpur and take action against the guilty persons who committed fraud and forgery and manipulated the revenue record." 2. It is contended that a free hold deed was executed by the State in favour of one Bhagwan Das Jaiswal, the father of the petitioner and Ishwar Chand Jaiswal, the Director of the respondent no. 4- company, on 19.09.2001. After the death of Bhagwan Das Jaiswal, the petitioner as well as the respondent no. 4 had moved an application for mutation before the revenue authority which is pending consideration. According to the counsels appearing for both the sides, a direction has already been issued for expediting the matter in respect of the mutation application moved on behalf of the respondent no. 4. Further, it has been stated that both the cases are running simultaneously. 3. This writ petition has been filed with a prayer to correct the revenue record and mention the name of Bhagwan Das Jaiswal son of Jamuna Prasad, Director Shakti Colonizers Pvt Ltd in place of S.K.P.L. Bhagwan Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anup Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Yogesh Chandra Jaiswal .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Das Jaiswal. 4. This Court after hearing the counsel for the parties and perusing the material on record finds that it is an admitted case that the land in question was recorded in the name of Bhagwan Das Jaiswal, in whose name the free hold right was granted by the State way back in the year 2001. After his death, the mutation application is pending which has been filed by both the sides. 5. As no useful purpose would be served in keeping the matter pending or calling for the counter affidavit, the revenue authority are hereby directed to proceed with both the mutation cases simultaneously and decide the same after considering the objection filed by both the sides strictly in accordance with law within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy of this order. 6. With the aforesaid directions, writ petition stands disposed of. October 6, 2025 A. V. Singh WRIC No. 33318 of 2025 2 (Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.) Digitally signed by :- AJAY VIKRAM SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad