Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9906 (AP)

R. Krishna Veni v. THE TAHSILDAR

WP/6798/2020 · 2025-03-24

T C D Sekhar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010110442020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3505] MONDAY ,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR WRIT PETITION NO: 6798/2020 Between: R. Krishna Veni ...PETITIONER AND The Tahsildar and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. G RAMA GOPAL Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP) 2 The Court made the following order: The petitioner claims that she is the absolute owner and possessor of lands admeasuring an extent of Ac.6.63 cents in Sy.No.281/1, an extent of Ac.0.48 cents in Sy.No.281/1 and an extent of Ac.1.71 cents in Sy.No.263 of Palacherla Village, Rajanagaram Mandal, East Godavari District. It is her further case that the respondents identified her lands for distribution of house site pattas to eligible beneficiaries under Navaratnalu Scheme. In pursuance thereof, the respondents, without issuing any notice to the petitioner are trying to interfere with her possession, aggrieved by the said action of the respondents, she preferred the present writ petition. 2. This Court on 17.03.2020, passed interim order directing the respondents herein not to interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the subject lands of the petitioner in question until further orders. The said interim order was subsisting till today. 3. When the matter is taken up for hearing today, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue placed on record the written instructions dated 24.03.2025, furnished by Tahsildar, 3 Rajanagaram. On perusal of the said instructions, it is stated that, before initiating any action for acquiring petitioner’s lands, she preferred the present writ petition. It is further stated that, in view of the interim order passed by this Court, the respondents have identified alternate lands for the purpose of the said scheme and the subject lands belonging to the petitioner are no more required. The said written instructions furnished by the Tahsildar are placed on record. 4. In view of the above, as no further orders are necessary, the present writ petition is disposed of, in terms of the interim order passed by this Court on 17.03.2020. 5. With the above directions, the present writ petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. _____________________ JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR Dt.24.03.2025 DSB 4 123 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR W.P.No.6798 OF 2020 Date: 24.03.2025 U DSB