Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9904 (RAJ)

BANWARI LAL KUDI S/O SHRI ARJUN LAL KUDI v. THE SECRETARY (ADMINISTRATION)

CW/3516/2025 · 2025-03-18

Sameer Jain

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:11964] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3516/2025 Banwari Lal Kudi S/o Shri Arjun Lal Kudi, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Village Turkiyawas, Post Bhojpura Kalan, Tehsil Jobner, District Jaipur (Raj.). ----Petitioner Versus 1. The Secretary (Administration), Agriculture Department, Rajasthan, Jaipur. 2. Commissioner, Agriculture Department, Agriculture Commissionerate, Jaipur. 3. Assistant Director, Agriculture (Extension), Kuchaman City. 4. Payal Rathi, Senior Agriculture Supervisor, Headquarters Sandwa, Assistant Director Agriculture (Extension), Sujjangarh, Churu. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Akshit Gupta For Respondent(s) : Mr. Aniket Beniwal for Mr. B.S. Chhaba, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Order 18/03/2025 Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that vide impugned order dated 07.02.2025 passed by Rajasthan Civil Services Appellate Tribunal, Jaipur it is directed that the competent authority shall consider the representation of the petitioner, in accordance with the law, and pass a speaking order. It is further contended that in spite of filing of representation by the petitioner, the same is not considered till date by the said authority. [2025:RJ-JP:11964] (2 of 2) [CW-3516/2025] In the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court deems it apposite to direct respondent No.1/competent authority to consider the representation of the petitioner equating the same with the administrative exigencies and pass a speaking order, strictly in accordance with the law, within an upper limit of ten days. It is made clear that the aforementioned directions are not complied with the respondents, the petitioner will be at liberty to file a contempt petition, before the appropriate forum. In view of the above, the instant petition stands disposed of. Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed. (SAMEER JAIN),J JKP/138