Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 99039 (ALL)

SHASHI CHAUDHARY AND 4 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

WRIC/33483/2025 · 2025-09-22

Amitabh Kumar Rai, Saral Srivastava

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 33483 of 2025 Court No. - 40 HON'BLE SARAL SRIVASTAVA, J. HON'BLE AMITABH KUMAR RAI, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for respondent No. 2 and learned Standing Counsel for the State- respondents. 2. By means of the present writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs:–. "1. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite party No. 3 to hold the elections of the board of directors of Sanjay Gandhi Memorial Sahkari Awas Samiti Limited at 1- A Hanumant Vihar colony, Quarsi, Aligarh, U.P. within the time frame as stipulated by this Hon'ble Court in the interst of justice. 2. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite parties especially the opposite party No. 2 not to appoint any administrator/interim management committee and allow the present elected committee of management of Sanjay Gandhi Memorial Sahkari Awas Samiti Limited at 1-A Hanumant Vihar Colony, Quarsi Aligarh. U.P. to continue as interim committee of management, after expiry of its term on 1.9.2025 with no power to take any policy and financial decisions, till the elections of the committee of management are held by the U.P. State Cooperative Societies Election Commission, in the interest of justice." 3. Learned counsel appearing for respondent No. 2 states that the Assistant Registrar has passed an order dated 04.09.2025 constituting the Interim Management Committee. A copy of the said order has been placed on record. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mohitosh Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Narendra Kumar Giri Shashi Chaudhary And 4 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) 4. In view of the aforesaid development, learned counsel for the petitioner prays that the present writ petition be dismissed as not pressed, with liberty to challenge the order dated 04.09.2025 in accordance with law. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed with the aforesaid liberty. September 23, 2025 Sumaira WRIC No. 33483 of 2025 2 (Amitabh Kumar Rai,J.) (Saral Srivastava,J.) Digitally signed by :- SUMAIRA AQUIL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- SUMAIRA AQUIL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- SUMAIRA AQUIL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- SUMAIRA AQUIL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad