HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 34765 of 2025 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE DR. YOGENDRA KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J. Heard Sri Vivekanand Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Abhishek Shukla, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel appearing for the State-respondents and Sri Bharat Singh, holding brief of Sri Pankaj Kumar Yadav, appearing for the caveator. Counsel for the petitioner has confined his relief to seeking a direction to respondent no.2, the Additional Commissioner (Administration) IIIrd Gorakhpur Division, Gorakhpur to decide the appeal no. C- 202405000000585 of 2024 (Ramashray vs. Baijnath), filed under Section 207 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, within a stipulated time period. It is submitted that the aforesaid appeal has been filed against an order dated 26.02.2024 passed in proceedings under 116 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. Counsel for the petitioner has referred to the 'order sheet' of the case, a copy whereof has been appended to the writ petition to point out that although several dates have been fixed but for some reason or the other, matter has been adjourned. The delay in disposal of the appeal is stated to be causing hardship to the petitioner. Accordingly, a prayer is made for a direction to the respondent No. 2, respondent no.2, the Additional Commissioner (Administration) IIIrd Gorakhpur Division, Gorakhpur, to conclude the proceedings at an early date. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vivekanand Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Naman Navin Singh, Pankaj Kumar Yadav, Sudhir Bharti Ramashray .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 10 Others .....Respondent(s) Learned counsel has also urged that the stay application filed in the appeal may also be accorded urgent consideration. Having regard to the aforesaid, the present petition is disposed of with an observation that the respondent No. 2 would make an endeavor to conclude the proceedings of the case, which is stated to be pending before it, preferably within a period of six months, without granting any unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties, provided there is no other legal impediment. Respondent No.2 would also be expected to pass an appropriate order on the stay application within a period of two weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order. October 7, 2025 Imroz WRIC No. 34765 of 2025 2 (Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava,J.) Digitally signed by :- MOHAMMAD IMROZ KHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad