Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9900 (AP)

KOYA SUBBARAO v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/6100/2025 · 2025-03-12

Harinath N

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010110262025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] WEDNESDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 6100/2025 Between: Koya Subbarao ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. PILLIX LAW FIRM Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following Order: The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that aggrieved by the inaction on the part of the 3rd respondent in taking any action on the representation of the petitioner dated 09.01.2025. 2. The learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing for the respondent Nos.1 to 3 submits that there are civil disputes between the petitioner and the unofficial respondents. It is also submitted by the learned Assistant Government Pleader that the petitioner never approached the 3rd respondent and no representation was received by the 3rd respondent which is alleged to have been sent by registered post. 3. As seen from the annexures filed along with the writ petition, the petitioner had addressed a registered letter to the 3rd respondent which was refused, as seen from the endorsement. 4. Considering the same, it is left open for the petitioner to submit a fresh representation to the 3rd respondent and on receipt of such representation, the 3rd respondent shall consider the same in accordance with Section 173 (3) of BNSS. 5. With the above observation, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date: 12.03.2025 Ksj