KHUSHIKA VENTURES LLP v. ARPIT LODHA S/O SHRI KAMAL CHAND LODHA
CW/3329/2025 · 2025-03-04
Narendra Singh Dhaddha
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 9899 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 9899 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3329/2025 Khushika Ventures Llp, (Llpin- Acb-5115), Having Its Registered Office At 18, Bharat Mata Path, Jamnalal Bajaj, C-Scheme, Jaipur-302001, Rajasthan Through Its Partner And Authorized Signatory Mr. Samar Agrawal. ----Petitioner Versus
1. Arpit Lodha S/o Shri Kamal Chand Lodha, R/o House No. 3767, Kundighar Bhairuji Ka Rasta, Johri Bazar, Jaipur Through Power Of Attorney Holder Ved Prakash S/o Shri Rajaraj, Aged Adult, R/o Plot No. 1269, Rani Sati Nagar, Jaipur.
2. Sanjay Bhandari S/o Shri Ramraj Bhandari, Aged About 58 Years, R/o House No. G-123, Ramanuj Path, Shyam Nagar, Jaipur.
3. Laxmi Jain W/o Subhash Jain, Aged About 61 Years, R/o C-127, Moti Marg, Bapu Nagar, Jaipur Through Power Of Attorney Holder Shri Sanjay Bhandari S/o Shri Ramraj Bhandari, Aged About 58 Years, R/o House No. G-123, Ramanuj Path, Shyam Nagar, Jaipur.
4. Pawan Jain S/o Shri Jaichand Lal Jain, Aged About 64 Years, R/o C-127, Moti Marg, Bapu Nagar, Jaipur Through Power Of Attorney Holder Shri Sanjay Bhandari S/o Shri Ramraj Bhandari, Aged About 58 Years, R/o House No. G- 123, Ramanuj Path, Shyam Nagar, Jaipur.
5. Sunil Jain S/o Shri Kailash Jain, Aged About 57 Years, R/o Anand Chambers, Indra Bazaar, Jaipur Through Power Of Attorney Holder Shri Sanjay Bhandari S/o Shri Ramraj Bhandari, Aged About 58 Years, R/o House No. G-123, Ramanuj Path, Shyam Nagar, Jaipur
6. Pradeep Gangwal S/o Shri Dharmchand Gangwal, Aged About 63 Years, R/o Anand Chambers, Indra Bazaar, Jaipur Present Resident Of 129, Moti Marg, Bapu Bazaar, Jaipur Through Power Of Attorney Holder Shri Sanjay Bhandari S/o Shri Ramraj Bhandari, Aged About 58 Years, R/o House No. G-123, Ramanuj Path, Shyam Nagar, Jaipur.
7. Sanyukt Grah Nirman Sahakari Samiti Ltd, Jaipur Through
(2 of 3) [CW-3329/2025] Shri Vinod Gupta, Manager, Confed Nehru Bhawan, 22 Godam, Jaipur.
8. Station House Officer, Police Station Shyam Nagar, Kings Road, Nirman Nagar, Jaipur.
9. Deputy Police Commissioner South, Commissionerate, Government Hostel, M.i. Road, Jaipur
10. Police Commissioner, Jaipur Metropolitan, Government Hostel, M.i. Road, Jaipur.
11. State Of Rajasthan, Through Home Secretary, Secretariat, Jaipur
12. Bir Singh S/o Shri Chandagi Ram, Aged About 55 Years, R/o Village Jhund Saray Abad, Post Pantali Railway Station, Tehsil Farooq Nagar, District Gurugram, Haryana- 122506 ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Bhrigu Sharma, Adv. For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA
Order 04/03/2025 By way of this petition, the petitioner seeks indulgence of this court to direct the learned Additional District Judge No.4, Jaipur Metropolitan-II, Jaipur (for short ‘the trial court’) to decide the application filed by the petitioner under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner filed an application under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC for impleadment as party defendant in Civil Suit No.14/2021 titled as “Arpit Lodha Vs. Sanjay Bhandari & Ors.” before the trial court on 07.10.2024 and the said application is also pending consideration before the trial
(3 of 3) [CW-3329/2025] court. So, in the interest of justice, the trial court may be directed to decide the application under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC expeditiously. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the present case and more particularly in view of the fact that the application under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC filed by the petitioner is pending consideration before the trial court since October, 2024, I dispose of civil writ petition with a direction to the trial court to decide the application filed by the petitioner under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC on 12.03.2025, the date already fixed by the trial court, in accordance with Law. Registry is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial court forthwith for information and compliance. Pending application(s), if any, also stand(s) disposed of.
(NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA),J Gourav/239