UJALA SELF HELP GROUP SHG v. STATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS
WRIC/33331/2025 · 2025-09-21
Prakash Padia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 98981 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 98981 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 33331 of 2025 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the respondents no.1 to 4, Sri Pankaj Kumar Gupta, learned counsel for the respondent no.5 and perused the records.
2. In view of the order proposed to be passed herein, no useful purpose would be served by putting the respondent no.6 to notice and keeping this petition pending before this Court. However, in case respondent no.6 feels aggrieved by the order his/her right to seek modification/variation of the order is being kept reserved.
3. A resolution dated 29.08.2025 was passed by the Gram Sabha of the Village-Dhenuganwa Khurd, Block-Parasrampur, District Basti (U.P.) in favour of respondent no.6-Roshni Self Help Group. A representation/objection dated 03.09.2025 was submitted by the petitioner- Ujala Self Help Group through Member, Dhenuganwa Khurd, Block-Parasrampur, Tehsil-Harraiya, District Basti (U.P.) before the respondent no.3-Sub Divisional Officer, Tehsil-Harraiya, District Basti. Since no decision has been taken on the same hence present writ petition.
4. An objection has been raised by counsel for the respondent no.5 that the aforesaid objections were submitted by the petitioner in his personal capacity and it should be filed by the group itself.
5. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the writ petition is being disposed of at the admission stage itself. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ram Milan Mishra, Satya Prakash Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Pankaj Kumar Gupta Ujala Self Help Group Shg .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s)
6. In the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner's firm is permitted to submit a fresh representation ventilating all his grievances before the respondent no.3 along-with certified copy of this order within a period of two weeks from today. If it is so, the respondent no.3 is directed to pass appropriate order in accordance with law within a further period of four weeks, thereafter. Needless to say that before passing any order on the representation submitted by the petitioner's firm, an opportunity of hearing should also be provided to the respondent no.6.
7. With the aforesaid observations, present writ petition is disposed of finally. September 22, 2025 Pramod Tripathi WRIC No. 33331 of 2025 2 (Prakash Padia,J.) Digitally signed by :- PRAMOD TRIPATHI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad