CRM-M- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 124 RAJINDER KUMAR SHARMA VIKRANT BHANOT & ORS. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present: SURYA PRATAP SINGH 1. Suraksha Sanhita the learned as ‘trial Court’ date of last transaction had already retired from the partnership of abovementioned firm and therefore, 2. the trial pertaining to abovementioned complaint the petitioner has been served with notice of accusation for the commission of offence punishable under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act. -50456-2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA CHANDIGARH RAJINDER KUMAR SHARMA VERSUS VIKRANT BHANOT & ORS. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA PRATAP SINGH Mr. Ketan Chopra, Advocate for SURYA PRATAP SINGH, J (ORAL) This is a petition filed under Section 528 of Bha Suraksha Sanhita 2023, for quashing of the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class Court’. The present petition has been filed on the ground that last transaction between the complainant already retired from the partnership of abovementioned firm and therefore, no liability can be fastened upon him. However, during the course of arguments, it has transpired that the trial pertaining to abovementioned complaint the petitioner has been served with notice of accusation for the commission of offence punishable under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-50456-2025 DECIDED ON: 10.09.202 .....PETITIONER VERSUS .....RESPONDENT SURYA PRATAP SINGH , Advocate for the petitioner. This is a petition filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik of order dated 21.07.2025 passed by Judicial Magistrate First Class, Ludhiana, hereinafter referred to The present petition has been filed on the ground that on the complainant and the firm, the petitioner already retired from the partnership of abovementioned firm and fastened upon him. However, during the course of arguments, it has transpired that the trial pertaining to abovementioned complaint is already in progress and the petitioner has been served with notice of accusation for the commission of offence punishable under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act. .2025 .....PETITIONER .....RESPONDENTS ratiya Nagarik passed by hereinafter referred to on the firm, the petitioner already retired from the partnership of abovementioned firm and However, during the course of arguments, it has transpired that is already in progress and the petitioner has been served with notice of accusation for the commission GAURAV THAKUR 2025.09.11 18:20 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M- 3. the petitione liberty to the petitioner that as for his 4. withdrawn with liberty aforesaid. Gaurav Thakur -50456-2025 In view of above, it has been submitted by learned the petitioner that the present petition may be dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner that he will move applications for discharge as well his permanent exemption before the learned trial Court In view of above, the present petition is here withdrawn with liberty aforesaid. 2 above, it has been submitted by learned counsel for the present petition may be dismissed as withdrawn with he will move applications for discharge as well before the learned trial Court. In view of above, the present petition is hereby dismissed as counsel for the present petition may be dismissed as withdrawn with he will move applications for discharge as well by dismissed as GAURAV THAKUR 2025.09.11 18:20 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document