Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 98973 (ALL)

ARYAN AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

WRIC/33535/2025 · 2025-10-06

Saral Srivastava, Sudhanshu Chauhan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 33535 of 2025 Court No. - 40 HON'BLE SARAL SRIVASTAVA, J. HON'BLE SUDHANSHU CHAUHAN, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Standing Counsel for the respondents. 2. The petitioner by means of the present writ petition has prayed for the following relief: "(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent nos. 2 & 3 to issue caste certificate of 'Baheliya' to the petitioners, within stipulated period to be specified by this Hon'ble Court. (ii) Issue any other writ, order or direction which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper under the facts and circumstances of the instant case. (iv) Award cost of the petition in favour of the petitioners" 3. The case of the petitioners is that they have applied for issuance of caste certificate of 'Baheliya' Caste which comes under the 'Scheduled Caste Category' before the respondent no.3-Tehsildar, Kasganj, District Kasganj. The mother of petitioner no.2 and wife of petitioner no.1, namely, Smt. Rajwati has also been issued a caste certificate of 'Baheliya' Caste by the respondent no.3-Tehsildar, Kasganj on 16.05.2019, but the respondent no.3 is not issuing caste certificate to the petitioner and kept the matter pending. 4. Learned Standing Counsel submits that no useful would be served in keeping the writ petition pending and appropriate direction may be issued to the respondent no.3 to consider the grievance of the petitioner. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Pramod Kumar Srivastava, Tripathi B.G. Bhai Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Aryan And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) 5. Accordingly, considering the facts and circumstances of the case and without going into the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed off permitting the petitioner to submit a fresh representation ventilating all his grievances before the respondent no.3-Tehsildar, Tehsil-Kasganj, District- Kasganj along with a certified copy of this order within a period of one month from today. In case any such representation is filed by the petitioner, respondent no.3 shall consider and decide the same strictly in accordance with law after giving due notice and opportunity of hearing to the petitioner within a period two months thereafter. October 7, 2025 NS WRIC No. 33535 of 2025 2 (Sudhanshu Chauhan,J.) (Saral Srivastava,J.) Digitally signed by :- NITIN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad