Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9897 (ALL)

SURENDRA KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIC/1923/2025 · 2025-01-22

Vikram D Chauhan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:10635 Court No. - 33 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 1923 of 2025 Petitioner :- Surendra Kumar Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ramesh Singh Kushwaha,Sushil Kumar Kushwaha,Uma Jaiswal Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Vikram D. Chauhan,J. 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that fair price shop of the petitioner has been suspended by the impugned order. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the stock register has been seized and other register/documents have also been seized and the enquiry is being held and a copy of the same is required for submission of the reply before the authority concerned. 2. Learned Standing Counsel for the respondent-State submits that if the petitioner files any application, documents would be provided to the petitioner. 3. Accordingly, the present writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to prefer an application before the respondent authority with regard to the documents required. The respondent authority shall provide the documents available with them within a period of fifteen days from the date of the application moved by the petitioner and thereafter proceed with the matter. Order Date :- 22.1.2025 VMA Digitally signed by :- VISHWA MOHAN ARORA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad