HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 33089 of 2025 Court No. - 32 HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J. 1. The instant writ petition has been filed seeking the following main prayers:- "I. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of MANDAMUS, commanding the Respondent No. 2 & 4 to appoint a new Research Supervisor to conduct and complete the Research work of the Petitioner in a fixed a frame. II. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of MANDAMUS, commanding the Respondent No. 2 & 4 to ensure that no further mental harassment is done to the Petitioner by prolonging the process of his research work. III. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of MANDAMUS, commanding the Respondent No. 2 & 4 to quantify the amount of scholarship not paid to the Petitioner due to non-cooperation of the Research Supervisor and pay the entire amount with penal interest." 2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner without entering into merits of the case, made an innocuous prayer that the petitioner may be permitted to file a fresh representation before respondent no.2 and a direction may be issued to him to decide the same in time bound manner. 3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent-University vehemently opposed the writ petition on merits, but has not opposed the Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Kamal Krishna Roy, Prabal Pratap, Saurabh Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : Avneesh Tripathi, C.S.C., Pratik Chandra Dilip Kumar Gupta .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) innocuous prayer as made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner. 4. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel appeared on advance accepted notice on behalf of the State-respondent, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent- University, perused the contents made in the writ petition and the documents on record. 5. Without entering into merits of the case, I am inclined to allow the innocuous prayer made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner as no objection made on behalf of learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent-University. Petitioner is directed to file a fresh representation along with present writ petition as well as certified copy of this order before respondent no.2 within 10 days from the date of production of certified copy of this order. After receiving the said representation, respondent no.2, Registrar, Chaudhary Charan Singh University, District Meerut is directed to decide the said representation in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of receiving of the said representation. 6. With the aforesaid directions/observations, the present writ petition is disposed of. September 19, 2025 Atul WRIC No. 33089 of 2025 2 (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ATUL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- ATUL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad