HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 11377 of 2025 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record. 2. The instant writ petition has been filed for following relief: " i. issue an order or direction directing the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Etah to decide the stay application pending in Original Suit No.542 of 2022 (Sunhari Lal Versus Laxman Singh) within stipulated period of time, pending before him. ii. issue an order or direction directing the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Etah to decide the Original Suit No.542 of 2022 (Sunhari Lal Versus Laxman Singh), within stipulated period of time, pending before him." 3. Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that an application for interim injunction under Order XXXIX Rule 1 of C.P.C. (6C Application) is pending since 2022 and the same has not been decided despite several dates have been fixed. He prayed that the same may be decided, expeditiously. 4. In view of above, no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Punya Sheel Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : Sunhari Lal .....Petitioner(s) Laxman Singh .....Respondent(s) 5. Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Etah to consider and decide the aforementioned interim injunction application (6C Application), in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of twelve weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order after ensuring service upon all the opposite parties, giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned and without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties provided that there is no other legal impediment. September 19, 2025 Nitika Sri. A227 No. 11377 of 2025 2 (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Digitally signed by :- NITIKA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad